2018年广东省中学生模联大会复赛流程、评分标准、议题
（一）复赛流程
复赛当天基本流程：
一、签到：8点开始签到
A. 流程：参赛选手到赛场后，到签到处签到，并领取参赛名牌。
B. 备注：请各位参赛选手及学校代表队按照自己的参赛时间到达会场，建议提前1小时到场准备。请勿迟到，亦勿过早到现场，以免影响其他选手。
二、比赛流程：9点正式开始比赛
A. 抽签：个人演讲题目个人抽签，团体（十人为一组）辩论题目委派一名代表进行抽签；
B. 第一阶段：按照参赛时间准时进入赛场进行个人演讲比赛，每人演讲时间为2分钟；
C. 第二阶段：个人演讲比赛结束后20分钟进行团队组合辩论，团体辩论分为正反方，每方各5人，辩论时间各方有10分钟。
D. 本次辩论采取改进后的“新式俄勒冈制”的国际辩论流程：
1. 正方一辩申论
2. 反方一辩申论
3. 正方二辩质询反方一辩
4. 反方二辩质询正方二辩
5. 正方三辩质询反方二辩
6. 反方三辩质询正方三辩
7. 正方四辩质询反方三辩
8. 反方四辩质询正方四辩
9. 正方五辩结辩
10. 反方五辩结辩
E. 辩论过程中，以不打扰双方发言选手为前提，可通过传纸条形式与队友交流，注意会场秩序及保持安静。
F. 辩论完毕后，本人比赛结束。
（二）复赛评分标准
一、演讲环节
Marking Criteria for 2018 GHSMUN Semi-finals
*Presentation that out of the assigned time limits will cause mark losing.
*不符合时长要求的演讲将会被扣分。
二、辩论环节
Marking Criteria for 2018GHSMUN Semi-finals
* Presentation that out of the assigned time limits will cause mark losing.
* 不符合时长要求的辩论将会被扣分。
-
-
（三）复赛议题
The topics we choose for this session are both closely related to the current heated international politics issues, and controversial to some extent. By focusing on these two topics, we hope we could derive your attention to these topics and see the full extension of them, so that you would have a better understanding of the world and develop holistic perspectives towards them.
此次复赛中选取的话题充满争议性，且与当前国际政治热点议题息息相关。组委会希望通过这两大议题，使同学们能够关注国际政治热点，并全面认知和分析这些热点议题，进一步更好地认识我们所处的世界和国际环境，并对这些话题有全面而辩证的认知。
VERY IMPORTANT: Please confirm your participation in the semi-finals by contacting the organizing committee or your respective teachers in charge of the matter before 23:59, May 3, 2018, or else you will not be added to the semi-finals competing list.
重要提示：入围复赛的同学，请在2018年5月3日23:59前向组委会确认参赛，逾期将被取消参赛资格！！！
Note: You should prepare for both topics as well as both sides of each topic, since you will be randomly assigned to any topic for your speech. The same goes for your debate preparation. Bear in mind while doing the research that you have to gain as much information of the topics as possible, and as diverse aspects of the topics as possible.
注意：由于复赛时采取抽签选择演讲题目，及随机抽签决定辩论正反方的形式，请同学们在准备过程中务必全面地研究两个议题及它们的正反面。请牢记，在调研过程中需要尽量全面系统地收集话题相关信息，尽量多面多角度剖析问题和寻求解决方案。
Topic 1: The Position of the United States on the Palestine-Israel issue.
话题1：美国在巴以问题上的立场
Topic Background:
话题背景：
On the Palestine-Israel issue, almost the entire international community stands on the Palestinian side and supports the Palestinian-Israeli peace negotiations, opposing Israel’s unilateral declaration of Jerusalem as its capital and the construction of a separation belt and settlement in the west bank of the Jordan River.
在巴以问题上，基本上整个国际社会都站在巴勒斯坦一边，支持巴以和谈，反对以色列单方面宣布耶路撒冷为自己首都及在约旦河西修建隔离带和建立定居点。
The United States, However, has persisted in its own way, ignoring the opposition of the international community, and has always been partial to Israel on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, including but not limited to the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Specially, the United States used its veto power to vote on a draft resolution on the status of Jerusalem at the UN security council on December 18, 2017. The draft resolution shows no legal effect on any change in the status of Jerusalem in response to the United States’ decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
然而，美国却一意孤行，不顾国际社会的反对，一味在巴以问题上偏袒以色列，包括但不限于承认耶路撒冷为以色列首都。特别是在2017年12月18日联合国召开的安理会上，在对一份有关耶路撒冷地位问题的决议草案进行表决时，美国使用了一票否决权将。该决议草案表明对耶路撒冷地位的任何改变都没有法律效力，以回应美国决定承认耶路撒冷为以色列首都。
Although the United States has always been criticized by some countries for double standards on many international issues, it is almost challenging the moral bottom line and the international community on the Israeli-Palestinian issue which will no doubt damage its international image of democratic leaders of the free world.
虽然美国在许多国际问题上一贯被某些国家诟病使用双重标准。但在巴以问题上，美国几乎是在挑战整个国际社会的道义底线而一意孤行，这无疑会给美国自由和民主世界的领袖这一国际形象造成一定损害。而美国之所以如此偏袒以色列，则是出于诸多现实利益的考虑。
Speech Topic: The United States should choose to give priority to morality and
support Palestine/ choose to give priority to interest and be partial to Israel.
演讲题目：在巴以问题上，美国应该道义优先，选择支持巴勒斯坦/在巴以问题上，美国应该利益优先，选择偏袒以色列。
Debate Topic:
辩论题目：
Pros：The United States should choose to give priority to morality and support Palestine.
正方：在巴以问题上，美国应该道义优先，选择支持巴勒斯坦
Cons： The United States should choose to give priority to interest and be partial to Israel.
反方：在巴以问题上，美国应该利益优先，选择偏袒以色列。
Topic 2: Migrating to Mars
话题2：移民火星
Topic Background:
话题背景：
Steven Hawkings, renowned scientist who passed away recently, stated repeatedly his vision towards the future of human race: ‘if humans can survive the next 200 years and learn to live in space, then our future will be bright. ...... It will be difficult enough to avoid disaster on planet Earth in the next 100 years, let alone next thousand, or million.’
已故著名科学家史蒂芬霍金，生前曾反复强调他对人类未来生存的愿景：“如果人类在今后200年内能幸存下来，学会在太空中生活，那么我们的未来依旧光明。……在未来100年避免地球上的种种灾难将十分困难，毋论更久远的未来。”
According to the Dutch not-for-profit Mars One Foundation, its first crew of 4 astronauts will depart from Earth in 2031 and land in Mars in 2032. Additional crews and cargo modules will be sent every 26 months hereafter. Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, has given an even earlier schedule: sending astronauts to Mars in 2024.
荷兰一家非盈利基金会 Mars One，计划将在 2031 年把第一批宇航员（共 4 名）从地球送往火星，预计于 2032 年登陆。该基金会还计划在登陆成功后的每 26个月往火星运送宇航员及物资组件。埃隆马斯克，美国太空探索技术公司的首席执行官，则给出了一个更早的时间表：该公司计划在 2024 将宇航员送往火星。
However, back to our Earth, billions of people still lack access to freshwater, hundreds of millions are suffering from malnutrition. Every minute, 20 people are being forcibly misplaced; every minute, more than 190,000 square metres of forests are being lost.
然而，当我们回望地球，我们发现：数以十亿计的人们仍缺乏生存必须的淡水，数以亿计的人们缺少足够的营养。每分钟，地球上有 20 人被迫流离失所；每分钟，超过19万平方米森林被人为或因环境恶化被破坏。
Speech Topic:
Humans should / should not migrate to Mars.
演讲题目：人类应当 / 不应移民火星。
Debate Topic:
辩论题目：
Pros: Human beings should migrate to Mars
正方：人类应该移民火星。
Cons: Human beings should not migrate to Mars
反方：人类不应该移民火星。
Please state your stance clearly and try to argue with substantive evidence.
请清晰陈述所选立场，并尽可能立足事实、数据等展开说理。
如各位参赛选手及带队老师还有任何疑问，请联系组委会。
邮箱：moliangd@163.com
电话：18902332665
联系人：黄老师
特此通知。
广东省中学生模拟联合国大会组委会
2018年4月28日
- 还没有人评论，欢迎说说您的想法！
